|
|
|
When Shall I Use Will? |
| related articles:
|
CSI's Manual of Practice states the way the words "shall" and "will" are to be used, and discourages use of the word must.
If one follows the rule, there is no need for the word "must." Is there a difference between "shall" and "must"? Can a difference be inferred by the contractor? If so, a court will certainly rule in the contractor's favor. Perhaps, the jury will reason, there is a continuum of responsibility for compliance, with "shall" at the high end, "may" at the bottom, and "must" and "should" somewhere in between. Another source is more emphatic.
Finally, from an English language reference:
When speaking of the contractor, "shall" indicates the requirement that an action be performed. When speaking of the owner or the A/E, "will" indicates not a promise, but an expectation of some action. Note that these rules apply to the specifications, which are directed to the contractor. The conditions of the contract, which are not specifications, are written differently. Here you will find many instances where the owner is required to perform some action so the contractor can perform properly and efficiently. In those cases, you will find that "the Owner shall" do certain things. © 1996 Sheldon Wolfe, RA, CSI, CCS, CCCA |
|
Web site design and content Copyright © 1995-2004 Sheldon Wolfe Material from CSI Chapter newsletters used with permission. |